Postpartum Care in the Time of COVID-19: The Use of Telemedicine for Postpartum Care.

Background: Telemedicine was implemented at our institution in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Data do not currently exist about the use of telemedicine in providing comprehensive postpartum care. Objective: This project aimed to evaluate the impact of telemedicine on postpartum care at an urban Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC). Study Design: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who delivered at an urban hospital in New York between September and November 2019 (pre-COVID), February through April 2020 (peak-COVID) and June through August 2020 (ongoing-COVID). The primary outcome was postpartum visit attendance. Secondary outcomes included contraception use, breastfeeding, depression screening, hospital readmission, and emergency department visit rates. Log-binomial regression models were used to estimate relative risk. Results: Telemedicine accounted for 1% of postpartum visits in the pre-COVID cohort, 60% in the peak-COVID cohort, and 48% in the ongoing-COVID cohort. Postpartum visit attendance rates were 52% in the pre-COVID cohort, 43% in the peak-COVID cohort, and 56% in the ongoing-COVID cohort (p > 0.05). There was a nonsignificant increase in postpartum visit show rate for telemedicine visits compared to in-person visits in the peak-COVID cohort (76% vs. 65%; relative risk [RR] 1.17 [0.87-1.57]) and ongoing-COVID cohort (85% vs. 74%; RR 1.16 [0.90-1.50]). Patients were significantly less likely to have a Patient Health Questionnaire-2 Depression screen in the peak-COVID and ongoing-COVID cohorts (22% and 33%) than in the pre-COVID cohort (74%) (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences in hospital readmissions, contraceptive use or breastfeeding rates across cohorts (p > 0.05). Conclusions: At our urban FQHC, telemedicine was comparable to in-person postpartum care in terms of attendance rates during the COVID-19 pandemic, without an increase in rates of hospital visits or readmissions. However, postpartum depression screening needs to be better integrated into the telemedicine visit type.

Systematic review of the evidence for resolution of common breastfeeding problems-Ankyloglossia (Tongue Tie).

AIM: Tongue tie is a common problem affecting breastfeeding due to poor infant latch and/or maternal pain. Evidence of whether treatment improves breastfeeding outcomes is conflicting. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the effectiveness of tongue-tie treatment on breastfeeding difficulties. METHODS: We searched peer-reviewed and grey literature in MEDLINE (OVID), PubMed, CINAHL Plus, EMBASE and PsycINFO, from 01/1970 to 09/2019. INCLUSION: randomised and non-randomised clinical trials, and quasi-experimental study designs, involving breastfeeding interventions for full-term singleton infants, using standardised measure of breastfeeding difficulty. EXCLUSION: qualitative and purely observational studies, lacked operational definition of breastfeeding difficulty, lacked control/comparison group. We assessed risk of bias, summarised study quality and results and conducted meta-analysis using random effects modelling. RESULTS: Six studies on tongue-tie division were included (4 randomised and 2 non-randomised). Meta-analysis of standardised mean differences in breastfeeding difficulty scores in four studies showed statistically significant differences in favour of frenotomy (Pooled SMD +2.12, CI:(0.17-4.08)p = 0.03). Similarly, a statistically significant difference in favour of frenotomy was observed for pain (Pooled SMD -1.68, 95% CI: (-2.87- -0.48). CONCLUSION: Results support that infant frenotomy is effective for improving standardised scores on breastfeeding difficulty and maternal pain scales and could improve breastfeeding outcomes.

Improving perinatal depression screening and management: results from a federally qualified health center.

INTRODUCTION: Perinatal depression affects 8.5-20% of women. In a systematic review 22% of women with a positive depression screen use mental health services. The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness of on-site management in the perinatal setting and barriers to care. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of 1042 women who received perinatal care between 1 January to 31 December 2019. Primary outcome was percentage of patients who were assessed after a positive depression screen. The secondary outcome was to determine factors affecting patients' receptiveness to assessment/treatment. RESULTS: 9.52% of women screened positive. Sixty-two (63.9%) met with an on-site social worker for assessment, 6 (6.2%) misunderstood the screening questions, and 33 (34.0%) met criteria for depression. Of those, 9 (27.3%) attended at least one follow-up, 8 (24.2%) were referred to or already in care, 7 (21.2%) no-showed, and 9 (27.3%) declined further care. English speaking patients were more likely to meet with a social worker for diagnostic assessment (69.9% versus 45.8%, P = 0.033). CONCLUSION: On-site management of a positive depression screen yielded a follow-up rate of 64% versus 49% in other studies. Non-English language may be a barrier to accessing mental health car.